Second, they are not suitable for all places. They do not work as well as special-purpose bulbs such as for garage door openers or refrigerators.
First, the savings from compact fluorescent bulbs (CFBs) take are minor and have to be figured over months or years. The CFBs have been over-sold on this, I've been using them for decades in some lamps and I don't get anywhere near the life that is promised. Sometimes the bulbs fail faster than a comparable incandescent bulb would have.
Writing in the Washington Post, Stephen Stromberg, shows what's wrong with the Progressives. He's fit to be tied because Congress attached a rider that would defund enforcement of electric light efficiency standards, effectively bringing back the incandescent bulb. In Stromberg's view, the incandescent light bulb has no place in modern society because it is not particularly efficient. Americans were too slow to adopt more efficient bulbs so it was up to the government to force us to make the right choices.Here's the problem, his one-size-fits-all approach doesn't always work,
They look terrible when replacing a decorative bulb. So do the other replacements available,
CFBs are actually made by hand so all of our energy-efficient bulbs are produced overseas, mainly in China, by underpaid workers.
They contain mercury and other toxic substances which end up in the landfill.
None of this matters to Stromberg. He knows what the correct bulb is and he wants it mandated that we use it for our own good.
This describes the Progressive movement in a nutshell - it's a bunch of elites who want to dictate how everyone else should live.